We use cookies to give you the best possible experience while you browse through our website. By pursuing the use of our website you implicitly agree to the usage of cookies on this site. Learn More - Privacy Policy

By Deepa Shetty | Thu Jun 05 2025 | 2 min read

Table of Contents

For electronics manufacturers selling into California, understanding what counts as exposure under Proposition 65 isn’t just a legal necessity — it’s a critical part of product strategy. While it’s easy to assume that “exposure” refers only to chemicals leaking or spilling, Prop 65 takes a much broader view.

If your device contains even trace amounts of listed chemicals — and a consumer can come into contact with them under reasonably foreseeable use — you’re likely on the hook for a Prop 65 warning.

What Does “Exposure” Mean Under California Proposition 65?

Under Prop 65, “exposure” refers to any pathway through which a listed chemical enters the body, including:

  • Inhalation (e.g. fumes from solder or circuit board coatings)
  • Ingestion (e.g. accidental transfer of substances from hand to mouth)
  • Dermal absorption (e.g. touching a plastic casing containing phthalates)

And here’s the kicker: It doesn’t matter if your product is sealed or rarely touched. If regulators determine there’s a reasonably foreseeable route of exposure during normal use, maintenance, repair, or disposal — you're responsible.

Real-World Exposure Scenarios for Electronics

Here are examples of how Prop 65 defines exposure in common electronics use cases:

Here are examples of how Prop 65 defines exposure in common electronics use cases.PNG

When Is a Prop 65 Warning Required?

A Prop 65 warning is required before exposure occurs, which means manufacturers must:

  1. Assess the likelihood of exposure through normal or foreseeable use.
  2. Determine if any listed substances are present in the product or its components.
  3. Quantify exposure levels (if defending against the need for a warning).
  4. Issue a clear and compliant warning if thresholds are exceeded or testing isn’t conclusive.

If your exposure levels are below Safe Harbor Limits, you may not need a warning — but the burden of proof lies with you.

Testing & Exposure Assessments: What’s Enough?

Prop 65 doesn’t mandate a specific testing protocol, but enforcement agencies and private plaintiffs expect a rigorous scientific approach. That includes:

  • Material declaration review
  • Laboratory testing and toxicological assessment
  • Exposure modeling or risk assessment reports
  • Documentation of use scenarios

If you're relying solely on supplier declarations without verifying exposure potential across product use stages — you’re exposed.

Stay Ahead with Acquis: Exposure Risk Mitigation Made Scalable

Acquis helps electronics manufacturers de-risk Prop 65 exposure issues with a compliance automation platform built for real-world complexity.

We help you:

  • Conduct SVHC and Prop 65 chemical screenings
  • Automate risk-based exposure assessments
  • Manage Safe Harbor evaluation and warnings
  • Generate customer-ready Prop 65 documentation

Let us turn complex exposure evaluations into proactive compliance.

Not sure if your electronics products meet Prop 65 exposure thresholds? Let’s find out.

Book a Free Exposure Risk Consultation

Speak to Our Compliance Experts


Understanding "Exposure" Under Prop 65

What counts as exposure under California Prop 65?

Do sealed electronics need a Prop 65 warning?

How do I prove my product doesn’t need a Prop 65 warning?

Is relying on supplier declarations enough?

What’s the penalty for not providing a required Prop 65 warning?