Table of Contents
The European Union has fundamentally reset how sustainability information is governed.
Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), sustainability reporting is no longer voluntary, narrative-driven, or separate from financial reporting. It is now a regulated, standardised, and auditable obligation, delivered through the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS).
For companies, the real challenge is not understanding ESRS at a conceptual level. The challenge is executing ESRS correctly across scope, materiality, value-chain data, governance, and assurance — and being able to prove every decision under audit.
What Are the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)?
The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) are the mandatory sustainability reporting standards under CSRD. They define:
- what sustainability information must be disclosed,
- how materiality is assessed,
- where disclosures must be published (the management report), and
- how information is assured.
Once a company is within CSRD scope, ESRS are compulsory. Other frameworks such as GRI or ISSB may complement internal processes, but they do not replace ESRS for regulatory reporting.
Step 1: Determine CSRD Applicability (Scope Is a Legal Decision)
Before collecting data or drafting disclosures, companies must determine whether CSRD applies and at what level.
This assessment depends on:
- company size thresholds,
- listing status,
- group structure,
- EU vs non-EU presence,
- consolidation boundaries.
Misjudging scope is one of the most common and most serious CSRD failures — because all subsequent reporting depends on it.
Read: CSRD Applicability Explained: Which Companies Must Report Under ESRS
Step 2: Understand the Real CSRD Reporting Timeline (Not the Simplified One)
CSRD does not apply to all companies at the same time.
Some companies are already reporting. Others are phased in, with timelines adjusted through EU-level sequencing and proportionality measures. What has not changed is the obligation itself.
Treating CSRD as a single future deadline leads to under-preparation and audit risk.
Read: CSRD & ESRS Reporting Timeline: What Is Fixed, What Is Sequenced, and What Is Changing
Step 3: Perform Double Materiality (The Compliance Gatekeeper)
Double materiality is the legal mechanism that determines which ESRS topics a company must disclose.
A topic is material if it is material under:
- impact materiality (effects on people or the environment), or
- financial materiality (risks or opportunities affecting enterprise value).
Auditors do not test opinions — they test methodology, documentation, thresholds, and approvals. Weak materiality logic invalidates the entire sustainability statement.
Read: Double Materiality Under CSRD: How to Perform and Document It Defensibly
Step 4: Disclose What Is Material (ESRS Topics in Practice)
Once materiality is established, disclosures follow the ESRS topical structure. These are not optional checklists — they are triggered by documented materiality outcomes.
ESRS Environmental Standards (E1–E5)
Environmental ESRS cover:
- climate change,
- pollution,
- water and marine resources,
- biodiversity and ecosystems,
- resource use and circular economy.
Most required data does not sit inside the reporting entity. It lives in products, materials, suppliers, and upstream operations. Environmental ESRS compliance therefore depends on structured supplier data collection, validation, and evidence retention.
Read: ESRS Environmental Standards (E1–E5): What Companies Must Disclose
ESRS Social Standards (S1–S4)
Social ESRS extend accountability beyond direct employees to:
- workers in the value chain,
- affected communities,
- consumers and end users.
These disclosures are where companies are tested on supplier governance, human-rights due diligence, grievance mechanisms, and enforcement, not policy intent.
Read: ESRS Social Standards (S1–S4): Workforce, Suppliers, Communities
ESRS Governance & Business Conduct (G1)
Governance disclosures determine whether environmental and social data can be trusted.
ESRS G1 requires companies to prove:
- policies are enforced,
- whistleblowing mechanisms are operational,
- issues are investigated and remediated,
- suppliers are governed, not just onboarded.
Weak governance undermines the credibility of all ESRS disclosures.
Read: ESRS Governance & Business Conduct (G1) Explained
Step 5: Prove It (Audit & Assurance Readiness)
Sustainability disclosures under CSRD are subject to mandatory statutory assurance. This is not a review exercise — it is a formal audit process.
Auditors will test:
- scope and consolidation decisions,
- materiality logic,
- data traceability (including suppliers),
- governance and internal controls,
- consistency with financial reporting.
Most CSRD failures occur here, not at disclosure drafting.
Read: ESRS Audit & Assurance Readiness: What Auditors Will Test
How CSRD Works as an Integrated System
In practice, compliant CSRD reporting follows a repeatable execution flow:
- Determine legal scope and reporting entities
- Align reporting timelines with financial close
- Perform and document double materiality
- Collect E, S, and G data (including value-chain inputs)
- Validate and govern evidence
- Publish disclosures in the management report
- Support statutory assurance
Treating any step as optional creates downstream audit exposure.
Final Reality Check
If your organisation cannot clearly explain:
- why it is in scope,
- why a topic is material or excluded,
- where the data comes from,
- how suppliers are governed,
- who approved key decisions,
then ESRS compliance is not defensible, regardless of how polished the report looks.