Australia’s PFAS Ban: What It Means for Businesses in 2025

Australia Joins the Global Crackdown on PFAS

The “forever chemicals” debate is no longer confined to Europe or the U.S. Australia has now taken decisive action.

From July 1, 2025, the country banned the manufacture, import, export, and use of PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS under its Industrial Chemicals Environmental Management Standard (IChEMS). These substances are listed as Schedule 7 the highest concern level.

This aligns Australia with the global PFAS compliance trend, where regulators are moving beyond voluntary phase-outs and into outright bans.

The Scope of the Ban: What’s Covered, What’s Exempt

• Banned: PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS (salts, isomers, precursors) across all industries.

• Allowed with conditions:

  • Trace contaminants (≤ 0.025 mg/kg).
  • Legacy products already in use.
  • R&D and analytical testing.

• Exempted:

  • Medical devices, medicines, biologicals, and packaging (confirmed by TGA in July 2025).
  • Certain imports under hazardous waste regulations.

For companies already dealing with RoHS compliance or REACH SVHCs, the lesson is familiar: don’t gamble on exemptions document everything and build phase-out plans.

PFAS NEMP 3.0: Australia’s Playbook for Contamination

Alongside the ban, Australia rolled out PFAS NEMP 3.0, a national guide that covers:

• Risk-based site investigations.
• Safe handling and reuse of contaminated land and biosolids.
• Sampling and remediation standards.
• Reporting and monitoring expectations.

This is Australia’s equivalent of supply chain compliance frameworks: setting out consistent rules across states to avoid regulatory patchwork.

Drinking Water Standards Tightened

The NHMRC has updated drinking water guideline values:

• PFOA: 200 ng/L
• PFOS: 8 ng/L
• PFHxS: 30 ng/L
• PFBS: 1,000 ng/L

In practice, utilities are being forced to act. In NSW’s Blue Mountains, water providers installed advanced granular activated carbon and ion exchange filters after PFAS contamination exceeded safe levels.

This mirrors debates under Prop 65 in California: once safe levels are codified, water utilities, manufacturers, and downstream suppliers carry the liability.

Industrial Discharges: Near-Zero by 2030

Industry is under the microscope too. Several states now require PFAS discharge limits as low as 0.07 µg/L (70 ng/L).

Key expectations:

• 70% cut by 2028 vs. 2023 levels.
• Near-zero discharges by 2030.
• Documentation required to deduct PFAS already in intake water.

Think of it like TSCA PFAS reporting in the U.S. regulators want a clear baseline, then year-on-year progress toward elimination.

Community Pressure and Agricultural Risks

Australia’s PFAS story isn’t just about regulations. It’s also about people:

• NSW communities near defense sites are demanding blood testing for PFAS exposure.
• Farmers are worried PFAS from aging renewable infrastructure (wind turbines, solar panels) could contaminate land and livestock — jeopardizing export certification.
• Sydney beaches have been flagged for PFAS contamination, with calls for better warning signs.

As seen with REACH compliance in Europe, regulators don’t move in a vacuum public pressure accelerates the legislative clock.

Your Compliance Action Plan

1. Audit your supply chain for PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS — even trace levels.
2. Document exemptions (medical, R&D, legacy) with airtight evidence.
3. Update discharge treatment to meet new state limits.
4. Review NEMP 3.0 and align with its monitoring and remediation standards.
5. Baseline 2023 discharges and set a roadmap to 2028.
6. Engage suppliers now for PFAS-free declarations — like you already do with REACH or RoHS.
7. Evaluate automation — tools like the Acquis compliance automation platform can help scale reporting, supplier outreach, and audit prep.

Contact us today to schedule a PFAS compliance diagnostic.