We use cookies to give you the best possible experience while you browse through our website. By pursuing the use of our website you implicitly agree to the usage of cookies on this site. Learn More - Privacy Policy

Tue Oct 10 2023 | 2 min read

Table of Contents

Navigating PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances) regulations is no longer just a legal obligation, it’s a strategic necessity. As the U.S. sees a surge of state-level PFAS laws and federal TSCA Section 8(a)(7) mandates, manufacturers face growing pressure to adapt or face fines, product bans, and reputational damage.

Why PFAS Compliance Is Now a Manufacturer Priority

PFAS regulations are accelerating across the United States. From reporting mandates to outright product bans, state lawmakers are no longer waiting for federal action. The result? A fragmented landscape where staying compliant in one state might mean violating rules in another.

Common Compliance Challenges

Prioritization Problem: Manufacturers must decide which state to tackle first. But focusing on one can mean non-compliance in others.

Supplier Fatigue: Collecting tailored data for every regulation overwhelms suppliers, leading to low response rates and unreliable declarations.

Inconsistent Inventories: Many companies maintain state-by-state chemical inventories, which multiplies costs and increases error rates.

The TSCA Inventory Strategy: One List to Rule Them All

The solution? Focus on PFAS listed under the TSCA Inventory.

Why it works:

  • PFAS used in U.S. commerce must be TSCA-listed

  • One-time data collection satisfies multiple state and federal mandates

  • Reduces redundant supplier outreach and reporting overhead

TSCA 8(a)(7) forms the compliance backbone for many states. It’s the logical anchor for product audits and declaration campaigns.

PFAS State Laws: 12 U.S. State Specific Regulations Shaping Compliance in 2025

Here’s a breakdown of twelve U.S. states that have enacted key PFAS laws, what each regulation targets, and how businesses should respond.

Kentucky: HB116 – PFAS Reporting & Working Group Mandate

Effective: January 1, 2025.

Annual reporting, $1,000/day penalties, and wastewater monitoring requirements.

Washington: HB 1047 – Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act

Effective: January 1, 2025.

PFAS banned in cosmetics. Reformulation support for small businesses. Up to $10,000 fines per violation.

Vermont: Act No. 131 – PFAS Bans in Everyday Products

Effective: Phased from July 2024 to July 2028.

Applies to cookware, food packaging, juvenile products, menstrual goods. Includes education and certification mandates.

New York: Senate Bill S992-B – PFAS-Free Anti-Fog Products

Effective: December 31, 2025.

Bans PFAS in anti-fogging sprays and wipes. Labeling allowed. $25,000 penalties for repeat violations.

Illinois: SB0561 – PFAS Reduction Act

Effective: January 1, 2025.

Bans PFAS in firefighting foams. Requires reporting, proper disposal, and manufacturer disclosures to fire departments.

Connecticut: SB 292 – Comprehensive PFAS Product Ban

Effective: Begins October 2024, fully enforced by January 1, 2028.

Targets over 12 product categories: apparel, cookware, dental floss, carpets. Requires PFAS labeling and DEEP notifications.

Tennessee: SB1786 – PFAS Drinking Water Regulation

Effective: July 1, 2024.

Annual monitoring and public disclosure of PFAS in drinking water. Reinforces transparency in contamination reporting.

Maine: Act to Stop PFAS Pollution

Effective: Reporting in effect; full ban by January 1, 2030.

Requires manufacturers to report products with intentionally added PFAS. Prohibits sale of non-essential PFAS products starting in 2030.

California: Prop 65 & PFAS-Specific Product Bans

Effective: Ongoing.

Mandates PFAS warnings under Prop 65 and bans PFAS in textiles, cookware, and juvenile products under new laws (AB 1817, AB 2771).

Minnesota: PFAS in Consumer Products Act

Effective: Reporting in effect; bans phased in starting January 1, 2025.

Requires manufacturers to disclose PFAS in all products. Bans non-essential PFAS in many categories by 2032.

Michigan: PFAS Firefighting Foam Ban

Effective: Active.

Bans PFAS in Class B firefighting foam. Mandates proper disposal. The State invests in PFAS site remediation.

Colorado: PFAS-Free Labeling and Product Restrictions

Effective: Phased 2024–2026.

Regulates labeling and restricts PFAS in cookware, textiles, carpets, and personal care items. Prohibits misleading “PFAS-free” claims.

Acquis: Your End-to-End PFAS Compliance Solution

Tired of juggling regulations? Acquis streamlines every aspect of PFAS compliance:

✅ Automated Recordkeeping: Capture part, product, and supplier data for TSCA and state laws.

✅ Supplier Outreach at Scale: Auto-filter suppliers by regulation or product line. Fewer emails. Better response rates.

✅ Smart Declarations: Generate reports with built-in validation to prevent non-compliance.

✅ Audit-Ready Reports: Substance-level detail across all parts and products. Exportable, standard-compliant files.

Stay compliant, stay competitive, with Acquis.

Speak to Our Compliance Experts


Mastering PFAS Compliance in the U.S.: 12 State Laws

What’s the best way to comply with multiple PFAS state laws?

What products are affected by state-level PFAS laws?

Which states have the strictest PFAS laws?

Is PFAS compliance just about reporting?

How does Acquis help with PFAS compliance?